Nissan Pathfinder Fourth generation
The Nissan Pathfinder Fourth generation (2013–2020): dimensions, weights, reliability and the official figures of its 8 versions in the United States and Canada.
Model codes: R52 · Sold in: United States and Canada
Dimensions, weights and capacity
| Specification | North America | Wikipedia |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,010–5,040 mm TC | 5,042 mm |
| Width | 1,960 mm TC | 1,963 mm |
| Height | 1,770–1,780 mm TC | 1,766 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,900 mm TC | 2,900 mm |
| Front track | 1,670 mm TC | – |
| Rear track | 1,670 mm TC | – |
| Weights and towing | ||
| Kerb weight | 1,923–2,121 kg TC | – |
| Seats and space | ||
| Fuel tank | – | 74 L |
| Performance | ||
| Top speed | – | 190 km/h |
| Torque | – | 325–351 Nm |
NHTSA overall safety rating (US): 2013: ★★★★☆ · 2014–2020: ★★★★★
Ranges cover the generation’s versions and body styles; European and North American versions can differ. Sources: Transport Canada vehicle specifications, Wikipedia (en, de), NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings. Wikipedia figures are used under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Reliability and owner reports
Owner complaints to NHTSA (US)
2,287 complaints for model years 2013–2020. 72 crashes · 8 fires · 72 injuries
- Transmission and drivetrain 729
- Engine 398
- Airbags 358
- Brakes 183
- Electrical system 178
- Speed control 118
Complaints are reported by owners and not checked by NHTSA; they are not adjusted for how many cars were sold, so popular models have more. NHTSA owner complaints
All 8 versions of the Nissan Pathfinder Fourth generation
United States 6 versions
Model years sold in the USA, from the EPA and the Department of Energy (fueleconomy.gov). MPG on the EPA test; litres per 100 km = 235.215 ÷ MPG.
| Years and version | Engine | Fuel | Gearbox | Drive | Consumption (combined) | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017–2020SIDI | 3.5 L | Petrol | Continuously variable (CVT) | Front-wheel drive | 23 MPG (10.2 L/100 km) EPA | 244–245 g/km |
| 2017–2020SIDI | 3.5 L | Petrol | Continuously variable (CVT) | Four-wheel drive | 21–22 MPG (10.7–11.2 L/100 km) EPA | 249–263 g/km |
| 2013–2016 | 3.5 L | Petrol | Continuously variable (CVT) | Front-wheel drive | 22–23 MPG (10.2–10.7 L/100 km) EPA | 242–252 g/km |
| 2013–2016 | 3.5 L | Petrol | Continuously variable (CVT) | Four-wheel drive | 21–22 MPG (10.7–11.2 L/100 km) EPA | 256–263 g/km |
| 2014–2015 | 2.5 L | Hybrid | Continuously variable (CVT) | Front-wheel drive | 26 MPG (9.0 L/100 km) EPA | 201–213 g/km |
| 2014–2015 | 2.5 L | Hybrid | Continuously variable (CVT) | Four-wheel drive | 26 MPG (9.0 L/100 km) EPA | 208–214 g/km |
Canada 2 versions
Model years sold in Canada, from Natural Resources Canada fuel consumption ratings (5-cycle test).
| Years and version | Engine | Fuel | Gearbox | Consumption (combined) | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013–2020Sport utility vehicle: Small | 3.5 L | Petrol | Continuously variable (CVT) | 10.2–11.0 L/100 km 5-cycle | 239–259 g/km |
| 2014–2015Sport utility vehicle: Standard | 2.5 L | Petrol | Continuously variable (CVT) | 8.8 L/100 km 5-cycle | 202 g/km |
Similar models from other brands
Official figures are measured on standard test procedures and differ between markets. Your consumption depends on how, where and in what conditions you drive.