GMC Yukon Second generation

The GMC Yukon Second generation (2000–2006): dimensions, weights, reliability and the official figures of its 16 versions in the United States and Canada.
Model codes: GMT800
Dimensions, weights and capacity
| Specification | Europe | Wikipedia |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,560 mm RDW | 5,001–5,052 mm |
| Width | 1,980 mm RDW | 2,004 mm |
| Height | 1,880 mm RDW | 1,948 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,950 mm RDW | 2,946 mm |
| Weights and towing | ||
| Kerb weight | 2,375 kg RDW | 2,405 kg |
| Mass in running order | 2,475 kg RDW | – |
| Gross vehicle weight | 3,175 kg RDW | – |
| Towing, braked trailer | 3,500 kg RDW | – |
| Towing, unbraked trailer | 750 kg RDW | – |
| Seats and space | ||
| Seats | 7 RDW | – |
| Doors | 4 RDW | – |
| Performance | ||
| Top speed | 170 km/h RDW | – |
Ranges cover the generation’s versions and body styles; European and North American versions can differ. Sources: RDW type approvals (Netherlands), Wikipedia. Wikipedia figures are used under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Reliability and owner reports
Owner complaints to NHTSA (US)
1,329 complaints for model years 2000–2006. 95 crashes · 20 fires · 85 injuries · 3 deaths
- Brakes 371
- Electrical system 267
- Engine 74
- Airbags 65
- Tyres 40
- Fuel system 34
Complaints are reported by owners and not checked by NHTSA; they are not adjusted for how many cars were sold, so popular models have more. NHTSA owner complaints
All 16 versions of the GMC Yukon Second generation
Show all 16 versions
United States 11 versions
Model years sold in the USA, from the EPA and the Department of Energy (fueleconomy.gov). MPG on the EPA test; litres per 100 km = 235.215 ÷ MPG.
| Years and version | Engine | Fuel | Gearbox | Drive | Consumption (combined) | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–2009CLKUP | 4.8 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Rear-wheel drive | 14–16 MPG (14.7–16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 345–394 g/km |
| 2002–2006FLEX-FUEL, CLKUP | 5.3 L | Flex fuel (E85) | 4-speed automatic | Four- or all-wheel drive | 14 MPG (16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 394 g/km |
| 2000–2006CLKUP | 5.3 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Four- or all-wheel drive | 13–15 MPG (15.7–18.1 L/100 km) EPA | 368–425 g/km |
| 2001–2006CLKUP | 5.3 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Rear-wheel drive | 14–15 MPG (15.7–16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 368–394 g/km |
| 2002–2006FLEX-FUEL, CLKUP | 5.3 L | Flex fuel (E85) | 4-speed automatic | Rear-wheel drive | 14–16 MPG (14.7–16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 345–394 g/km |
| 2004–2006CLKUP | 6.0 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Four- or all-wheel drive | 13 MPG (18.1 L/100 km) EPA | 425 g/km |
| 2000–2005CLKUP | 4.8 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Four- or all-wheel drive | 14–16 MPG (14.7–16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 345–394 g/km |
| 2003LM7, CLKUP | 5.3 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Rear-wheel drive | 14 MPG (16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 394 g/km |
| 2003LM7, CLKUP | 5.3 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Four- or all-wheel drive | 13 MPG (18.1 L/100 km) EPA | 425 g/km |
| 2001–2003 | 6.0 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Four- or all-wheel drive | 12–13 MPG (18.1–19.6 L/100 km) EPA | 425–460 g/km |
| 2000POLICE, CLKUP | 4.8 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | Rear-wheel drive | 14 MPG (16.8 L/100 km) EPA | 394 g/km |
Canada 5 versions
Model years sold in Canada, from Natural Resources Canada fuel consumption ratings (5-cycle test).
| Years and version | Engine | Fuel | Gearbox | Consumption (combined) | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–2006Sport utility vehicle | 4.8 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | 15.0–17.0 L/100 km 5-cycle | 345–391 g/km |
| 2000–2006Sport utility vehicle | 5.3 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | 15.5–19.3 L/100 km 5-cycle | 357–444 g/km |
| 2002–2006Sport utility vehicle | 5.3 L | Flex fuel (E85) | 4-speed automatic | 21.5–23.8 L/100 km 5-cycle | 344–381 g/km |
| 2001–2006Sport utility vehicle | 6.0 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | 17.1–20.0 L/100 km 5-cycle | 393–460 g/km |
| 2000Sport utility vehicle | 5.7 L | Petrol | 4-speed automatic | 18.7 L/100 km 5-cycle | 430 g/km |
Similar models from other brands
Official figures are measured on standard test procedures and differ between markets. Your consumption depends on how, where and in what conditions you drive.





