Isuzu

Isuzu Rodeo Sport

No photo yet

The official data lists 11 versions of the Isuzu Rodeo Sport (2001–2003), in the United States. Each market publishes its own figures, measured on its own test procedure.

At a glance

Years in the data
2001–2003
Markets
United States
Engines
2.2 L to 3.2 L
Fuels
Petrol
Lowest consumption (United States)
12.4 L/100 km (EPA)

What kind of vehicle was the Isuzu Rodeo Sport?

The Rodeo Sport was Isuzu’s compact SUV for the United States, sold from 2001 to 2003. It was the US-market name for the Amigo from 2001, and sat alongside the larger Rodeo in Isuzu’s SUV range. The short, two-door body was offered with a hardtop or soft top.

The first generation, identified by the UE code, covered 2001 to 2003. The name connected the Amigo more closely with the Rodeo, while the compact two-door format remained distinct.

Engines and power

US versions used petrol engines ranging from 2.2 L to 3.2 L. The range included four-cylinder and V6 engines, with two-wheel drive and four-wheel drive available.

How economical was the Isuzu Rodeo Sport?

The best combined EPA rating was 19 MPG. The lowest listed consumption was 12.4 L/100 km under the EPA procedure. EPA testing differs from European WLTP and NEDC procedures and Canada’s 5-cycle test. The US range covered 11 versions from 2001 to 2003.

Questions and answers

When was the Rodeo Sport sold in the United States?

It was sold in the US from 2001 to 2003.

What engines did it use?

The petrol range ran from 2.2 L to 3.2 L and included four-cylinder and V6 engines.

What body styles were available?

It was a two-door SUV offered with a hardtop or soft top.

What was its best combined EPA rating?

Its best combined EPA rating was 19 MPG.

Rodeo Sport first generation (2001–2003)

Model codes: UE · Sold in: United States · References: automobile-catalog.com, en.wikipedia.org

United States 11 versions

Model years sold in the USA, from the EPA and the Department of Energy (fueleconomy.gov). MPG on the EPA test; litres per 100 km = 235.215 ÷ MPG.

Years and versionEngineFuelGearboxDriveConsumption (combined)CO₂
2003L-4, 2MODE CLKUP2.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive18 MPG (13.1 L/100 km) EPA307 g/km
2003L-4, SIL2.2 LPetrol5-speed manualRear-wheel drive19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
2003V-6, 2MODE CLKUP3.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
2003V-6, 2MODE CLKUP3.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticFour- or all-wheel drive17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
2001–20022MODE CLKUP · L-4, 2MODE CLKUP2.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
2001–2002SIL · L-4, SIL2.2 LPetrol5-speed manualRear-wheel drive18 MPG (13.1 L/100 km) EPA307 g/km
2001–20022MODE CLKUP · V-6, 2MODE CLKUP3.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticFour- or all-wheel drive16 MPG (14.7 L/100 km) EPA345 g/km
2002V-6, 2MODE CLKUP3.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
2002V-6, SIL3.2 LPetrol5-speed manualFour- or all-wheel drive17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
20012MODE CLKUP3.2 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive16 MPG (14.7 L/100 km) EPA345 g/km
2001SIL3.2 LPetrol5-speed manualFour- or all-wheel drive16 MPG (14.7 L/100 km) EPA345 g/km

Official figures are measured on standard test procedures and differ between markets. Your consumption depends on how, where and in what conditions you drive.