Ford Thunderbird Ninth generation

Ford Thunderbird Ninth generation
Photo: Greg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0

The Ford Thunderbird Ninth generation (1984–1988): dimensions, weights, reliability and the official figures of its 18 versions in the United States.

Model codes: Fox · Sold in: United States and Canada

Dimensions, weights and capacity

SpecificationNorth AmericaWikipedia
Dimensions
Length–5,019–5,133 mm
Width–1,806 mm
Height–1,351–1,356 mm
Wheelbase–2,647 mm
Seats and space
Luggage space (EPA)425 L EPA–
Passenger space (EPA)2,605 L EPA–

Ranges cover the generation’s versions and body styles; European and North American versions can differ. Sources: Wikipedia, US EPA fuel economy data. Wikipedia figures are used under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Reliability and owner reports

Owner complaints to NHTSA (US)

216 complaints for model years 1984–1988. 13 crashes · 51 fires · 20 injuries · 2 deaths

  • Electrical system 77
  • Seat belts 33
  • Engine 21

Complaints are reported by owners and not checked by NHTSA; they are not adjusted for how many cars were sold, so popular models have more. NHTSA owner complaints

All 18 versions of the Ford Thunderbird Ninth generation

Show all 18 versions

United States 18 versions

Model years sold in the USA, from the EPA and the Department of Energy (fueleconomy.gov). MPG on the EPA test; litres per 100 km = 235.215 ÷ MPG.

Years and versionEngineFuelGearboxDriveConsumption (combined)CO₂
1986–1988(FFS,TRBO)2.3 LPetrol5-speed manualRear-wheel drive19–20 MPG (11.8–12.4 L/100 km) EPA276–291 g/km
1987–1988(FFS,TRBO)2.3 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive17–18 MPG (13.1–13.8 L/100 km) EPA307–325 g/km
1985–1988(FFS)3.8 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive19–21 MPG (11.2–12.4 L/100 km) EPA263–291 g/km
1985–1988(FFS)5.0 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive17–19 MPG (12.4–13.8 L/100 km) EPA291–325 g/km
1985–1986(FFS,TRBO)2.3 LPetrol3-speed automaticRear-wheel drive17–18 MPG (13.1–13.8 L/100 km) EPA307–325 g/km
1985–1986(FFS)3.8 LPetrol3-speed automaticRear-wheel drive18 MPG (13.1 L/100 km) EPA307 g/km
1985(FFS,TRBO) CA model · (FFS,TRBO)2.3 LPetrol5-speed manualRear-wheel drive19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1985(FFS) CA model3.8 LPetrol3-speed automaticRear-wheel drive18 MPG (13.1 L/100 km) EPA307 g/km
1985(FFS) CA model3.8 LPetrol4-speed automaticRear-wheel drive19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1984(FFS,TRBO) · (FFS,TRBO) CA model2.3 LPetrol3-speed automatic–18 MPG (13.1 L/100 km) EPA307 g/km
1984(FFS,TRBO)2.3 LPetrol5-speed manual–19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1984(FFS,TRBO) CA model2.3 LPetrol5-speed manual–19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1984(FFS)3.8 LPetrol3-speed automatic–17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
1984(FFS)3.8 LPetrol4-speed automatic–19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1984(FFS) CA model3.8 LPetrol3-speed automatic–18 MPG (13.1 L/100 km) EPA307 g/km
1984(FFS) CA model3.8 LPetrol4-speed automatic–19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1984(FFS)5.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic–17 MPG (13.8 L/100 km) EPA325 g/km
1984(FFS) CA model5.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic–16 MPG (14.7 L/100 km) EPA345 g/km

Similar models from other brands

Official figures are measured on standard test procedures and differ between markets. Your consumption depends on how, where and in what conditions you drive.