Ford

Ford Contour

Ford Contour
Photo: Cutlass / Wikimedia Commons · CC0

The official data lists 39 versions of the Ford Contour (1995–2000), in the United States and Canada. Each market publishes its own figures, measured on its own test procedure.

At a glance

Years in the data
1995–2000
Markets
United States, Canada
Engines
2.0 L to 2.5 L
Fuels
Petrol
Lowest consumption (United States)
9.4 L/100 km (EPA)
Lowest consumption (Canada)
9.4 L/100 km (5-cycle)

What is the Ford Contour?

The Ford Contour is a four-door family sedan sold in North America for the 1995–2000 model years. It was the North American version of the first-generation Ford Mondeo, adapted for the US and Canadian markets. Its Mercury counterpart was called the Mystique. With its practical sedan layout, the Contour was made for everyday driving, from commuting to family trips.

Generations and engines

The Contour had one generation, sold from 1995 to 2000. Its petrol engines ranged from 2.0 L to 2.5 L, including four-cylinder and V6 options.

How economical is the Ford Contour?

The US EPA gives the Contour a best combined rating of 25 MPG, with lowest listed consumption of 9.4 L/100 km. Canada’s lowest listed figure is also 9.4 L/100 km, measured using NRCan’s 5-cycle procedure. The EPA and Canadian figures use different test methods, so they are best understood within their own markets.

The Contour appears in US figures for 1995–2000 and Canadian figures for 1995–1999.

Questions and answers

Was the Ford Contour sold in Europe?

The Contour name was used in North America. Its related European model was sold as the Ford Mondeo.

What engines did the Ford Contour have?

Its petrol engines ranged from 2.0 L to 2.5 L.

What is the Ford Contour’s best combined EPA rating?

The best combined EPA rating is 25 MPG.

Contour first generation (1995–2000)

Ford Contour first generation
Photo: Cutlass / Wikimedia Commons · CC0

Model codes: CDW27 · References: en.wikipedia.org

United States 19 versions

Model years sold in the USA, from the EPA and the Department of Energy (fueleconomy.gov). MPG on the EPA test; litres per 100 km = 235.215 ÷ MPG.

Years and versionEngineFuelGearboxDriveConsumption (combined)CO₂
1999–20002.0Z2.0 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive25 MPG (9.4 L/100 km) EPA221 g/km
20002.0Z, CLKUP2.0 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive23 MPG (10.2 L/100 km) EPA240 g/km
20002.5M2.5 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1999–2000CLKUP · 2.5M, CLKUP2.5 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1999CLKUP2.0 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive23 MPG (10.2 L/100 km) EPA240 g/km
19992.5 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive20 MPG (11.8 L/100 km) EPA276 g/km
1998CLKUP2.0 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive24 MPG (9.8 L/100 km) EPA230 g/km
19982.0 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive25 MPG (9.4 L/100 km) EPA221 g/km
1997–1998(FFS), CLKUP · CLKUP2.5 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive22 MPG (10.7 L/100 km) EPA251 g/km
19982.5 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1996–1997(FFS), CLKUP2.0 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive23 MPG (10.2 L/100 km) EPA240 g/km
1997(FFS)2.0 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive24 MPG (9.8 L/100 km) EPA230 g/km
1997(FFS)2.5 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1995–1996(FFS), SIL · (FFS)2.0 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive25 MPG (9.4 L/100 km) EPA221 g/km
1996(FFS), CLKUP2.5 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1996(FFS)2.5 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive22 MPG (10.7 L/100 km) EPA251 g/km
1995(FFS), CLKUP2.0 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive24 MPG (9.8 L/100 km) EPA230 g/km
1995(FFS), CLKUP2.5 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive22 MPG (10.7 L/100 km) EPA251 g/km
1995(FFS)2.5 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km

Canada 20 versions

Model years sold in Canada, from Natural Resources Canada fuel consumption ratings (5-cycle test).

Years and versionEngineFuelGearboxConsumption (combined)CO₂
1999Compact2.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.3 L/100 km 5-cycle237 g/km
1999Compact2.0 LPetrol5-speed manual9.5 L/100 km 5-cycle219 g/km
1999Compact2.5 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.5 L/100 km 5-cycle265 g/km
1999Compact2.5 LPetrol5-speed manual11.5 L/100 km 5-cycle265 g/km
1998Compact2.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.0 L/100 km 5-cycle230 g/km
1998Compact2.0 LPetrol5-speed manual9.5 L/100 km 5-cycle219 g/km
1998Compact2.5 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.9 L/100 km 5-cycle251 g/km
1998Compact2.5 LPetrol5-speed manual11.5 L/100 km 5-cycle265 g/km
1997Compact2.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.2 L/100 km 5-cycle235 g/km
1997Compact2.0 LPetrol5-speed manual9.8 L/100 km 5-cycle225 g/km
1997Compact2.5 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.9 L/100 km 5-cycle251 g/km
1997Compact2.5 LPetrol5-speed manual11.0 L/100 km 5-cycle253 g/km
1996Compact2.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.1 L/100 km 5-cycle232 g/km
1996Compact2.0 LPetrol5-speed manual9.6 L/100 km 5-cycle221 g/km
1996Compact2.5 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.8 L/100 km 5-cycle248 g/km
1996Compact2.5 LPetrol5-speed manual10.8 L/100 km 5-cycle248 g/km
1995Compact2.0 LPetrol4-speed automatic9.9 L/100 km 5-cycle228 g/km
1995Compact2.0 LPetrol5-speed manual9.4 L/100 km 5-cycle216 g/km
1995Compact2.5 LPetrol4-speed automatic10.6 L/100 km 5-cycle244 g/km
1995Compact2.5 LPetrol5-speed manual11.1 L/100 km 5-cycle255 g/km

Official figures are measured on standard test procedures and differ between markets. Your consumption depends on how, where and in what conditions you drive.