Volvo

Volvo 850

Volvo 850
Photo: User Ksnaden on en.wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

The official data lists 22 versions of the Volvo 850 (1993–1997), in the United States and Canada. Each market publishes its own figures, measured on its own test procedure.

At a glance

Years in the data
1993–1997
Markets
United States, Canada
Engines
2.3 L to 2.4 L
Fuels
Petrol
Lowest consumption (United States)
11.2 L/100 km (EPA)
Lowest consumption (Canada)
11.2 L/100 km (5-cycle)

What is the Volvo 850?

The Volvo 850 was a family car offered as a saloon and an estate. It marked a major change for Volvo’s larger cars, with front-wheel drive and a five-cylinder engine mounted across the car. The estate added a generous load area to the saloon’s everyday practicality.

Generations and design

The 850’s P80 generation ran from 1992 to 1997. Volvo introduced the saloon first, followed by the estate. Its transverse five-cylinder layout and Delta-link rear axle shaped the car’s design. The 850 also introduced Volvo’s integrated side-impact protection system and a self-adjusting front seat-belt mechanism. The range later added turbocharged petrol versions and a direct-injection turbo-diesel. The S70 saloon and V70 estate succeeded the 850.

Engines and power

US and Canadian versions listed petrol engines from 2.3 L to 2.4 L. The wider range also included turbocharged petrol engines and a direct-injection turbo-diesel. The five-cylinder layout was a defining feature of the 850 and accompanied its shift to front-wheel drive.

How economical was the Volvo 850?

In the United States, the EPA ratings give a lowest listed combined consumption of 11.2 L/100 km and a best combined rating of 21 MPG. In Canada, the lowest listed consumption is also 11.2 L/100 km, measured using NRCan’s 5-cycle procedure. The EPA and Canadian procedures differ, so the results are not directly comparable.

Where was it sold?

The 850 was listed in the United States from 1993 to 1997 and in Canada from 1995 to 1997. The versions listed in both markets use petrol engines. Saloon and estate body styles offered different ways to balance passenger space and carrying room.

Questions and answers

What years did the Volvo 850 generation cover?

The P80 generation ran from 1992 to 1997.

Was the 850 front-wheel drive?

Yes. Its engine was mounted transversely and drove the front wheels.

What is the best US EPA combined rating listed?

The best listed rating is 21 MPG combined.

Why are the US and Canadian consumption figures not directly comparable?

The US figure uses the EPA procedure, while the Canadian figure uses NRCan’s 5-cycle procedure.

850 850 (1992–1997)

Volvo 850 850
Photo: User Ksnaden on en.wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

Model codes: P80 · Sold in: United States and Canada · References: en.wikipedia.org, volvocars.com

United States 7 versions

Model years sold in the USA, from the EPA and the Department of Energy (fueleconomy.gov). MPG on the EPA test; litres per 100 km = 235.215 ÷ MPG.

Years and versionEngineFuelGearboxDriveConsumption (combined)CO₂
1994–1997(FFS,TRBO), 2MODE CLKUP2.3 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive19 MPG (12.4 L/100 km) EPA291 g/km
1995–1997(FFS), 2MODE CLKUP2.4 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1994–1997(FFS)2.4 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1997(FFS,TRBO), 2MODE CLKUP2.4 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive20 MPG (11.8 L/100 km) EPA276 g/km
1994(FFS), 2MODE CLKUP2.4 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive20 MPG (11.8 L/100 km) EPA276 g/km
1993(FFS), 2MODE CLKUP2.4 LPetrol4-speed automaticFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km
1993(FFS)2.4 LPetrol5-speed manualFront-wheel drive21 MPG (11.2 L/100 km) EPA263 g/km

Canada 15 versions

Model years sold in Canada, from Natural Resources Canada fuel consumption ratings (5-cycle test).

Years and versionEngineFuelGearboxConsumption (combined)CO₂
1996–1997Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.3 LPetrol4-speed automatic12.1 L/100 km 5-cycle278 g/km
1996–1997Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.3 LPetrol5-speed manual12.4 L/100 km 5-cycle285 g/km
1996–1997Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol5-speed manual11.4 L/100 km 5-cycle262 g/km
1997Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.3 L/100 km 5-cycle260 g/km
1997Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.8 L/100 km 5-cycle271 g/km
1997Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol6-speed manual12.2 L/100 km 5-cycle281 g/km
1996Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.3 L/100 km 5-cycle260 g/km
1996Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol5-speed manual11.6 L/100 km 5-cycle267 g/km
1996Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.3 L/100 km 5-cycle260 g/km
1995Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.3 LPetrol4-speed automatic12.0 L/100 km 5-cycle276 g/km
1995Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.3 LPetrol5-speed manual13.0 L/100 km 5-cycle299 g/km
1995Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.8 L/100 km 5-cycle271 g/km
1995Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol5-speed manual11.6 L/100 km 5-cycle267 g/km
1995Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol4-speed automatic11.2 L/100 km 5-cycle258 g/km
1995Mid-size · Station wagon: Mid-size2.4 LPetrol5-speed manual11.2 L/100 km 5-cycle258 g/km

Official figures are measured on standard test procedures and differ between markets. Your consumption depends on how, where and in what conditions you drive.